![]() |
|
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Laboratory Manual |
Back
to Specimen Collection
Back to Main Page of Lab Manual
A more detailed description of our review and resulting changes to ordering menus follows:
A. Internal Data and Literature
Our own data show that the mean and median time to detection for yeasts is essential the same for the standard blood culture bottle and the Myco/F Lytic bottles (i.e., fungal/mycobacterial blood culture bottles).
Time to Detection (in days)
| Myco/F Lytic | Standard Blood Cultures | |
| average | 1.9 | 2.0 |
| median | 1.5 | 1.8 |
| mode | 1.5 | 1.5 |
In 2005, 21 episodes of candidemia were detected by the Myco/F Lytic system during this period, and 52 patients were detected with standard aerobic/anaerobic blood culture sets. 20% of the isolates detected by the Myco/F Lytic bottle were missed by routine blood culture sets and 40% detected by standard blood culture bottles were missed by proximate Myco/F Lytic cultures. The organisms missed by the standard blood culture system are not known to be particularly fastidious with the exception of one Malassezia furfur isolate that should have been cultivated by a special test that we offer (culture under sterile olive oil) rather than either the Myco/F Lytic or standard blood culture system. One paper describes results of artificial inoculation with bottles, and that Candida glabrata appeared to grow more slowly in standard blood culture bottles. Of note, however, none of the "misses" in our data were Candida glabrata.
One interpretation of our data is that patients with low numbers of yeast in their blood might be detected variably by either blood culture system by chance, and a miss by one or the other might not reflect a superiority of either method.
There are no studies in the literature convincingly demonstrating the superiority of the MycoF-Lytic bottle in detecting Candida species in clinical specimens.
B. Negative Impact of Current Excessive Use of Myco/F Lytic Bottles
Operationally, Myco/F Lytic bottles now occupy an entire blood culture machine (capacity 240 bottles). We are now at or exceed our total blood culture capacity and need to pull bottles of early and manually plant them on media, creating significantly extra work for the laboratory. Without intervention, we will need to acquire another blood culture machine and do not have room for it.
Of note, only 1.8% of patients who had Myco/F Lytic cultures were positive for Candida species and 1.0% of patients drawn had a positive Mycobacterial culture. Many patients had multiple sets. Although the Myco/F Lytic bottle is supposed to draw 1-5mls of blood, its vacuum will draw 17mls (internal data) and many bottles are "overfilled". The blood loss to patients is not insignificant and could be eliminated by more streamlined use.
C. Practices at Other Hospitals
Other regional academic medical centers surveyed do not offer a "fungal" blood culture bottle, but instead offer a manual method known as an isolator tube. In these hospitals, this method is used for detection of molds (not yeasts) and Mycobacteria, and is not a primary method for identifying yeast. We also surveyed a number of other tertiary care hospitals out of the state, including those that offer the Myco/F Lytic blood culture system, and found similar findings, where use of methods other standard blood culture bottles to detect yeast were actively discouraged.
D. Specific Proposal
The following changes will be made in POE/OMR:
Blood Culture for Dimorphic Fungi and Mycobacteria
Intercept Screen
Do not order this test for detection of Candida and related yeasts, as these are adequately detected in standard blood culture bottles.
For mycobacteria, this test should be used for detection of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) in HIV patients only with a CD4 count < 100 (typically < 50) and other similarly immunocompromised patients.
Order for dimorphic fungi, e.g., Histoplasma, Coccidiodes, or Blastomyces in someone with suspected systemic fungal infection & appropriate exposure history. NOTE: we have never had a positive Myco/F Lytic blood culture for these species at BIDMC. Consider using other methods for detection, e.g., antigen testing, serology, tissue biopsy and culture, or culture of respiratory fluids.
For invasive Aspergillosis detection, consider galactomannin assay and radiology findings, as fungal blood culture is insensitive. For systemic cryptococcosis, order a cryptococcal antigen test. For suspected Malassezia infection in patients on TPN, order a Malassezia blood culture.
A maximum of one test should be performed a week.
James Kirby, MD
Medical Director, Clinical Microbiology Laboratory
Howard Gold, MD
Medical Director, Antimicrobial Management
Last reviewed/revised 2/15/2008